Contrasting State Oversight Models in Houston and Fort Worth School Districts

A newly disclosed letter from the Texas Education Agency (TEA) reveals contrasting frameworks employed in the state’s supervision of Houston and Fort Worth Independent School Districts (ISDs). Both districts are under state scrutiny due to persistent academic and financial difficulties, yet TEA’s intervention tactics differ markedly. Houston ISD is experiencing a direct state takeover, with TEA installing a board of managers to replace the elected school board, prioritizing swift restructuring and accountability measures.

Conversely, Fort Worth ISD’s approach is more collaborative, maintaining the elected board’s presence but limiting its authority. A state-appointed conservator oversees district operations and advises the board, focusing on strengthening leadership capacity rather than full state control.

• Houston ISD: Complete replacement of the local board with state-appointed managers.
• Fort Worth ISD: Retention of elected board with oversight by a conservator.
• State Control Intensity: Houston faces direct management, while Fort Worth operates under advisory supervision.