Source link : https://love-europe.com/2025/01/02/slovakia/what-does-it-mean-for-europes-energy-future-firstpost/

Ukraine halted the transit of Russian gas through its pipeline network on January 1, bringing an end to decades of Moscow’s dominance over Europe’s energy markets. This move, initiated by Ukraine’s refusal to renew a prewar transit agreement, marks a significant turning point in the region’s energy landscape.

The stoppage follows nearly three years of war between the two nations, during which Russian gas continued to flow through Ukraine under a five-year deal that expired in 2024.

Ukraine’s Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko called it a “historic event,” stating, “Russia is losing markets and will incur financial losses.” He stated that this aligned with Europe’s decision to phase out Russian gas.

What alternative energy sources does Europe have?

European countries have prepared for this eventuality by diversifying their energy sources. Austria, Slovakia, and Hungary, the last major EU consumers of Russian gas through Ukraine, have sought alternative supplies.

Austria’s OMV and Slovakia’s SPP have turned to pipelines from Germany and LNG imports from the US. Meanwhile, Hungary, as well as Turkey and Serbia, continues to receive gas from Russia via the TurkStream pipeline traversing the Black Sea.

Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico remarked that the end of gas flows via Ukraine “will
drastically affect us all in the EU but not Russia.” Fico, known for his divergent stance on Russia compared to the European mainstream, previously criticised Kyiv’s refusal to renew the transit deal and warned of halting electricity exports to Ukraine in retaliation.

The European Union has invested heavily in enhancing its gas infrastructure since 2022. A spokesperson for the European Commission remarked, “The European gas infrastructure is flexible enough to provide gas of non-Russian origin. It has been reinforced with significant new LNG import capacities.”

Europe has slashed its reliance on Russian energy, dropping Russian pipeline gas’s share of its market from nearly 40 per cent to about 8 per cent by 2023. Key suppliers like Norway, the United States, and Qatar now play a prominent role in filling the gap.

What does this mean for Ukraine, Russia, and Moldova?

While the cessation of gas transit represents a strategic victory for Ukraine, the country faces economic repercussions. Transit fees, previously amounting to nearly $1 billion annually, will be lost. To offset this, Ukraine has increased domestic gas transmission tariffs, a move that could cost its industries $38 million annually.

Russia also faces significant losses. Gazprom, its state-owned energy giant, is set to lose around $5 billion annually. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the halt “one of Moscow’s biggest defeats,” adding that Europe must support Ukraine and Moldova during this energy transformation.

A general view shows the headquarters of Gazprom on the day of the annual general meeting of the company’s shareholders in Moscow, Russia, June 26, 2015. File Image/Reuters

Moldova, particularly its breakaway region of Transnistria,
has been hit hard. With Russian gas no longer flowing, the region’s residents face harsh winters and energy shortages. Local authorities have implemented emergency measures, urging citizens to conserve energy. Hospitals and critical facilities have been exempted, but a humanitarian crisis looms.

What does this mean for the European energy market?

The end of Russian gas transit through Ukraine underscores Europe’s commitment to energy independence. It accelerates the EU’s non-binding goal to eliminate Russian gas imports by 2027 and highlights the bloc’s efforts to bolster energy security through LNG imports and regional cooperation.

However, challenges remain. Countries like Slovakia and Hungary, which depended heavily on Russian gas, fear higher costs and reduced competitiveness. In response, the EU is working to integrate Ukraine’s energy grid with its neighbours and secure access to alternative supplies.

A view of the business tower Lakhta Centre, the headquarters of Russian gas monopoly Gazprom in St. Petersburg, Russia, April 27, 2022. File Image/APA view of the business tower Lakhta Centre, the headquarters of Russian gas monopoly Gazprom in St. Petersburg, Russia, April 27, 2022. File Image/AP

The shift also highlights the importance of renewable energy. Europe’s investment in wind and solar power has been instrumental in reducing dependency on fossil fuels. Analysts argue that greater emphasis on renewables could mitigate the risks associated with geopolitical tensions and supply disruptions.

What about the Ukraine-EU balance?

The cessation of Russian gas transit raises critical questions about future energy cooperation between Ukraine and the EU. For Ukraine, the focus must shift toward developing its own energy infrastructure, including the expansion of domestic gas production and renewable energy projects.

On Wednesday, Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski characterised Ukraine’s decision to cease gas transit as a victory for those opposing the Kremlin’s policies. In a post on X, Sikorski accused Moscow of systematically attempting to “blackmail Eastern Europe with the threat of cutting off gas supplies,” citing examples like a Baltic pipeline bypassing Ukraine and Poland to deliver gas directly to Germany.

Putin spent billions building Nordstream to circumvent Ukraine and blackmail Eastern Europe with the threat of cutting off gas supplies. Today Ukraine cut off his ability to export gas direct to the EU.
Another victory after the enlargement of NATO by Finland and Sweden.

— Radek Sikorski (@radeksikorski) January 1, 2025

The country has significant untapped potential in its gas fields and wind-rich regions, which could serve as a foundation for energy independence.

The EU, on the other hand, faces the challenge of supporting Ukraine while balancing its own energy needs. This could involve greater financial assistance for Ukraine’s energy reforms and closer integration of Ukrainian energy markets with the EU.

Joint investments in green energy projects and cross-border energy trade agreements may also be explored.

What is needed now?

The crisis has exposed vulnerabilities in Europe’s energy strategy, prompting calls for a more coordinated approach. Experts suggest creating a unified European energy policy that highlights resilience and sustainability.

This could include building additional LNG terminals, strengthening interconnections between national grids, and establishing a strategic gas reserve to cushion against future disruptions.

For countries like Moldova, targeted assistance will be crucial. International aid and EU support can help the country navigate its immediate energy challenges while laying the groundwork for long-term energy security.

This includes diversifying energy imports and investing in renewable energy projects to reduce reliance on external sources.

As Europe adapts to this new reality, the emphasis on green energy and regional cooperation will likely grow.

Also Watch:

With inputs from agencies

Source link : http://www.bing.com/news/apiclick.aspx?ref=FexRss&aid=&tid=677651bdcbb54a4f95327f4d34147138&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.firstpost.com%2Fexplainers%2Fukraine-stops-russian-gas-transit-it-means-for-europe-energy-future-13849268.html&c=3534118898181582991&mkt=de-de

Author :

Publish date : 2025-01-02 00:27:00

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

The post What does it mean for Europe’s energy future? – Firstpost first appeared on Love Europe.

—-

Author : love-europe

Publish date : 2025-01-02 08:43:47

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.